Anywho hero background

Who Owns (619) 222‑0089?

Summary for (619) 222-0089

SPAM CHECK:
No spam reports have been found.
POTENTIAL OWNERS:
C****** M B****** S******Y M M******+2 more
LOCATIONS:
San Diego, CAChula Vista, CA+8 more
PHONE TYPE:
Landline
PHONE CARRIER:
AT&T
FAMILY MEMBERS:
ADDRESS HISTORY:
EMAIL ADDRESSES:

View More

Phone Area Demographics

Statistic based on US Census data for San Diego, CA
35 y/o
Median Age
$71.5K
Median Income
$567K
Median Home Value
1.41M
Total Population

Lookup Another Number & See Owner Info

  • 1
    Enter any valid 10-digit phone number to begin.
  • 2
    Your search is protected - completely secure and private!
  • 3
    Discover detailed caller info: identity, address, online profiles and more.

(619) 222-0089 Owner Records

We found multiple public records for (619) 222-0089, which may include:

  • Current and past owners
  • Emails
  • Addresses
  • Social Media
  • Other Phone numbers
Google Maps

C****** M Blenis Sr.

AGE:
46
ADDRESS:
****** True North Trl, Summerville, SC, 29486
RELATIVES:
Y M MandevilleK****** T BlenisK****** B Hollister Jr.+1 more
EMAILS:
See available results
See All Details

Y M Mandeville

AGE:
48
ADDRESS:
****** True North Trl, Summerville, SC, 29486
RELATIVES:
T****** Bernard MandevilleC****** C MandevilleM****** L Gill+2 more
EMAILS:
See available results
See All Details

R****** G Gilkey

AGE:
56
ADDRESS:
****** White Oaks Rd, Laconia, NH, 03246
RELATIVES:
G****** Leon GilkeyM****** P MirandaM****** L Gilkey
EMAILS:
See available results
See All Details

W****** Joseph Clark

AGE:
74
ADDRESS:
****** Caminito Pescado, Unit 8, San Diego, CA, 92107
RELATIVES:
K****** Lee ClarkS****** Lynn WilsonT****** James Clark+2 more
EMAILS:
See available results
See All Details

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn everything you need to know about (619) 222-0089 in less than 60 seconds.


Who owns (619) 222-0089?


What is the carrier for (619) 222-0089?


Where is (619) 222-0089 based from?


What is the phone type for (619) 222-0089?


Has (619) 222-0089 been reported as spam?