Anywho hero background

Who Owns (972) 467-0139?

Summary for (972) 467-0139

SPAM CHECK:
No spam reports have been found.
POTENTIAL OWNERS:
P L B•P L B+7 more
LOCATIONS:
Rockwall, TX•Flint, TX+1 more
PHONE TYPE:
Wireless
PHONE CARRIER:
AT&T
FAMILY MEMBERS:
ADDRESS HISTORY:
EMAIL ADDRESSES:

See Phone Owner

Phone Area Demographics

Statistics based on US Census data for Rockwall, TX
33 y/o
Median Age
$62.4K
Median Income
$150K
Median Home Value
190.63K
Total Population

Lookup Another Number & See Owner Info

  • 1
    Enter any valid 10-digit phone number to begin.
  • 2
    Your search is protected - completely secure and private!
  • 3
    Discover detailed caller info: identity, address, online profiles and more.

(972) 467-0139 Owner Records

We found multiple public records for (972) 467-0139, which may include:

  • ✓Current and past owners
  • ✓Emails
  • ✓Addresses
  • ✓Social Media
  • ✓Other Phone numbers
Google Maps

P L B

AGE:28
ADDRESS: Salvatore Ln
EMAILS:See available results
See All Details

L D S

AGE:49
ADDRESS: Marsh Wren Cir
EMAILS:See available results
See All Details

L R S

AGE:106
ADDRESS: Glen Vista Dr N
RELATIVES:K D R
EMAILS:See available results
See All Details

L R A

AGE:110
ADDRESS: W Park Blvd, Apt
RELATIVES:C E A
EMAILS:See available results
See All Details

R A J

AGE:67
ADDRESS: Spring Park Center Blvd, Apt
RELATIVES:C S, J K J, J J
EMAILS:See available results
See All Details

L D P

AGE:30
ADDRESS: Village Fair Dr, Apt
RELATIVES:M A P, T M, L P I
EMAILS:See available results
See All Details

L P

AGE:30
ADDRESS: Avenue C
RELATIVES:M A P, L P I, M A K
EMAILS:See available results
See All Details

A W

AGE:71
ADDRESS: Barrymore Ln
RELATIVES:C M W, H L W, C P
EMAILS:See available results
See All Details

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn everything you need to know about (972) 467-0139 in less than 60 seconds.


Who owns (972) 467-0139?


What is the carrier for (972) 467-0139?


Where is (972) 467-0139 based from?


What is the phone type for (972) 467-0139?


Has (972) 467-0139 been reported as spam?