Anywho hero background

Who Owns (661) 256‑0094?

Summary for (661) 256-0094

SPAM CHECK:
No spam reports have been found.
POTENTIAL OWNERS:
M****** K****** F******B****** N****** F******+2 more
LOCATIONS:
Bakersfield, CAPalmdale, CA+8 more
PHONE TYPE:
Landline
PHONE CARRIER:
AT&T
FAMILY MEMBERS:
ADDRESS HISTORY:
EMAIL ADDRESSES:

View More

Phone Area Demographics

Statistic based on US Census data for Rosamond, CA
33 y/o
Median Age
$61.6K
Median Income
$151K
Median Home Value
19.67K
Total Population

Lookup Another Number & See Owner Info

  • 1
    Enter any valid 10-digit phone number to begin.
  • 2
    Your search is protected - completely secure and private!
  • 3
    Discover detailed caller info: identity, address, online profiles and more.

(661) 256-0094 Owner Records

We found multiple public records for (661) 256-0094, which may include:

  • Current and past owners
  • Emails
  • Addresses
  • Social Media
  • Other Phone numbers
Google Maps

M****** Karen Furr

AGE:
72
ADDRESS:
****** Wheel Wright Ct, Greensboro, NC, 27455
RELATIVES:
M****** R FurrR****** C Furr Jr.R****** K Furr+1 more
EMAILS:
See available results
See All Details

B****** Nichole Furrstanfield

AGE:
34
ADDRESS:
****** Applewood Rd, Martinsville, VA, 24112
RELATIVES:
R****** C Furr Jr.R****** K FurrK****** S Furr+1 more
EMAILS:
See available results
See All Details

K****** S Furr

AGE:
47
ADDRESS:
****** Bluejack Oak Ct, Huntersville, NC, 28078
RELATIVES:
C****** Judson FurrR****** C Furr Jr.R****** K Furr+1 more
EMAILS:
See available results
See All Details

R****** K Furr

AGE:
78
ADDRESS:
****** Wheel Wright Ct, Greensboro, NC, 27455
RELATIVES:
M****** R FurrR****** C Furr Jr.K****** S Furr+2 more
EMAILS:
See available results
See All Details

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn everything you need to know about (661) 256-0094 in less than 60 seconds.


Who owns (661) 256-0094?


What is the carrier for (661) 256-0094?


Where is (661) 256-0094 based from?


What is the phone type for (661) 256-0094?


Has (661) 256-0094 been reported as spam?